§ 42.300. Procedure; pendency.
286 words·~1 min read·
/us/cfr/t37/s§ 42.300·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)A covered business method patent review is a trial subject to the procedures set forth in subpart A of this part and is also subject to the post-grant review procedures set forth in subpart C except for §§ 42.200, 42.201, 42.202, and 42.204.
(b)In a covered business method patent review proceeding, a claim of a patent, or a claim proposed in a motion to amend under § 42.221, shall be construed using the same claim construction standard that would be used to construe the claim in a civil action under 35 U.S.C. 282(b), including construing the claim in accordance with the ordinary and customary meaning of such claim as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art and the prosecution history pertaining to the patent. Any prior claim construction determination concerning a term of the claim in a civil action, or a proceeding before the International Trade Commission, that is timely made of record in the covered business method patent review proceeding will be considered.
(c)A covered business method patent review proceeding shall be administered such that pendency before the Board after institution is normally no more than one year. The time can be extended by up to six months for good cause by the Chief Administrative Patent Judge, or adjusted by the Board in the case of joinder.
(d)The rules in this subpart are applicable until September 15, 2020, except that the rules shall continue to apply to any petition for a covered business method patent review filed before the date of repeal. \[77 FR 48731, Aug. 14, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 28566, May 19, 2015; 81 FR 18766, Apr. 1, 2016; 83 FR 51359, Oct. 11, 2018\]
Connections3 cite this · traces to 1
Cited by 3 sections
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 1Cited by 3 across 1 source